I also asked a student that does not study at Harris. This
person is in year 11 and also does not study media at all. She is a complete
outside party to the entire process so I know that her response will be genuine
and accurate.
The videos were set up in a question and answer format. The participants
did not know what questions I was going to ask them so this made it easier for
them to evaluate. Because they did not know what to expect, their response
would clearly be their genuine opinion.
From my feedback, I could tell that the participants liked
my final piece. One of the main features that were popular amongst my
participants was the music. I was told that my music was effective as it helped
to indicate what the genre of the film would be. Another positive for my video
was the way in which the camera was used. The lighting of a lot of the scenes
were also said to be effective as it gave a sense of tension which further
helped to indicate the genre to the audience.
One area of improvement is the duration of the clip. The clip
itself was less than 2 minutes long which may not be reflective of actual media
products. If I was to re do this task, I would definitely ensure that I acquire
enough footage to make the piece long enough. During the production process,
duration was a problem for this piece and it is definitely one of my targets
for future pieces. Another area of improvement is the special effects. In
future pieces I would like to use more effects to make the piece look more professional.
Instead of using similar effects, I would like to try and use a range to make
the piece more interesting and attractive.
I also asked a third person to watch my video. The above video was their response to what they saw.
No comments:
Post a Comment